Understanding the Exposure Triangle | Aperture | Wilson Chu, Connor Watson, Diego Armando Magan, and Drew Vogt

 Group Members : Wilson Chu, Connor Watson, Diego Armando Magan, and Drew Vogt

5.6 f-stop

7.1 f-stop

10 f-stop

14 f-stop

18 f-stop

20 f-stop

25 f-stop

29 f-stop

32 f-stop

36 f-stop

1.  We think 5.6 f-stop is the most successful because the depth of field was greater and it blurred out more of the background. We feel like it really focuses on the water bottle as the main subject, and the blur is really cool looking.

2. We decided the 36 f-stop was the least successful because it captured too much. The depth of field was very little to none which made it so there was less blur. It still shows the main subject but it doesn't emphasize it as much since the background is so clear. The person in the background that got their face blurred was also unlucky.